1. Wherefore the law was our __________ to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. (Galatians 3:24)
2. But after that faith is come, we are ____ ______ under a schoolmaster. (Galatians 3:25)
3. For ye are all the children of God by _______ in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:26)
4. For as many of you as have been ________ into Christ have put on Christ. (Galatians 3:27)
5. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all ____ in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)
6 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye ________ ________ , and heirs according to the promise. (Galatians 3:29)
Please read the Book of Judges
9. When you read Judges, what pattern did you find there? If you do not have time to read all of the book of Judges at least try to read enough of it to find the pattern that became the identifying characteristic of the Israelite nation.
10. Give an example of the pattern revealed in Judges. A pattern of events means that they reoccur over and over again. Tell what happened in one of the cycles.
Psalm 79 Commentary
Commentary by Burton Coffman
A Lament Over The Destruction of Jerusalem and a prayer for Vengeance
George DeHoff called this psalm, "The Funeral Anthem of a Nation."<1>
Charles M. Miller's analysis of this psalm points out that it exhibits several elements found in other psalms: (1) Ps. 79:5,7,10a are lamentation; (2) Ps. 79:6,10b,12 are imprecations; (3) Ps. 79:8-9 are pleas for forgiveness; (4) Ps. 79:11 pleads for deliverance; and (5) Ps. 79:13 carries a pledge of praise and thanksgiving following deliverance.<2>
Three possible occasions identified with this psalm were proposed by Halley, namely, "The invasion of Shishak, the fall of the northern kingdom, and the Babylonian captivity."<3> Delitzsch suggested the time of the desecration of the Temple by Antiochus Epiphanes.<4>
To this writer, the only logical selection is that of the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the final captivity of the residue of the people that accompanied the capture and deportation of Zedekiah to Babylon. There are many reasons for this choice.
(1) There is the fact that for eighteen centuries, "The Jews have recited this psalm upon the 9th day of the Jewish month Ab, commemorating the two destructions of Jerusalem (by the Babylonians in 587 B.C., and by the Romans in A.D. 70). This practice may point to an old tradition associating this psalm with the Babylonian period."<5>
(2) Shishak never entered Jerusalem. (2) Antiochus Epiphanes did not destroy either the temple or the city of Jerusalem. (3) The mention of the people's captivity (Ps. 79:11) points squarely to the Babylonian era. (4) The complete destruction of Jerusalem (Ps. 79:1) occurred only once in pre-Christian history, namely in 587 B.C.; and (5) many of the ablest scholars we have consulted agree on the Babylonian date and occasion.
"The only time which adequately fits this description is the exilic period after the burning of Jerusalem and the temple by Nebuchadnezzar in 587 B.C.<6> The Babylonian destruction seems most appropriate.<7> `Jerusalem in heaps' is truer of the Babylonian captivity than of the times of Antiochus Epiphanes.<8> It seems best to assign it to the period of the destruction of Jerusalem by the Chaldeans.<9> The general voice of commentators is that the psalm must be referred to the time of the Babylonian conquest."<10>
The psalm naturally falls into two divisions. First, there is a description of the disaster (Ps. 79:1-4). The remaining nine verses are a prayer for deliverance, forgiveness, vengeance upon enemies, etc.
Ps. 79:1
"O God, the nations have come into thine inheritance;
Thy holy temple have they defiled;
They have laid Jerusalem in heaps."
"The nations, " i.e. "the Gentiles." It was an especially bitter thing for the Jews that a pagan nation was permitted to triumph over them. "It is the height of reproach when a father casts upon a slave the task of beating his son. Of all outward judgments against Israel, this was the sorest."<11>
"They have laid Jerusalem in heaps." Some writers have made too much of the fact that it is not stated here that the temple was destroyed, but `defiled.' However, the destruction of it would have been indeed a defilement; and besides that, how could it be imagined that with the whole city in "heaps" the temple would not have suffered the same fate as the rest of the city?
Biblical Account of Babylonian Destruction of Jerusalem